Dark Angel Index du Forum
Dark Angel
Hacking and Reverse
 
Dark Angel Index du ForumFAQRechercherS’enregistrerConnexion

:: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) ::

 
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    Dark Angel Index du Forum -> X-Files -> Ufos
Sujet précédent :: Sujet suivant  
Auteur Message
4l3x
Administrateur
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 04 Nov 2009
Messages: 96

MessagePosté le: Mer 9 Déc - 10:21 (2009)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Répondre en citant

Il semblerait que l'armée US profite de son engagement en iraq pour tester de nouvelles saloperies armes technologiques.






Le THEL en fait partie, les videos Youtube sont édifiantes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfr-1fJMTbo


Article sur Democracy Now:
http://www.democracynow.org/2006/7/25/u_s_broadcast_exclusive_star_wars


Revenir en haut
Publicité






MessagePosté le: Mer 9 Déc - 10:21 (2009)    Sujet du message: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Revenir en haut
Fwank
Membre
Membre

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 25 Nov 2009
Messages: 100

MessagePosté le: Mer 9 Déc - 21:47 (2009)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Répondre en citant

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13129.htm
DL de la video: http://www.videos.informationclearinghouse.info/guerre_stellari_english.wmv


Revenir en haut
Fwank
Membre
Membre

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 25 Nov 2009
Messages: 100

MessagePosté le: Sam 26 Déc - 13:58 (2009)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Répondre en citant

http://www.oulala.net/Portail/article.php3?id_article=2538

8 août 2006
Par Monica Zoppé - Il Manifesto.

De nombreux témoignages ont désormais été recueillis par des hôpitaux, témoins, artificiers, journalistes, soulevant des doutes très graves sur certains épisodes de l’offensive israélienne actuelle au Liban et à Gaza. En plus de la dispersion d’uranium appauvri, et des dommages écologiques importants dus aux carburants et substances chimiques répandus suite des bombardements d’usines et de dépôts, les récits et les images qui montrent « des symptômes étranges et inconnus » suscitent une préoccupation particulière.
On parle de corps dont les tissus sont nécrosés mais qui n’ont pas de blessures apparentes ; de corps apparemment « rapetissés » ; de blessés dont les jambes à moitié emportées continuent à se nécroser malgré l’amputation, et qui meurent ; des cas ont été décrits de blessures internes comme celles provoquées par une explosion, mais sans traces d’éclats ; ou bien de cadavres noircis alors qu’ils ne sont pas brûlés, ou d’autres qui avaient été apparemment blessés mais ne semblent pas avoir saigné...

Tout cela suggère la possibilité que des armes nouvelles aient été utilisées : des armes à énergie directe, des agents chimiques et biologiques, en une sorte d’expérimentation macabre de guerre future dans laquelle on ne respecte rien : ni règles internationales (de la convention de Genève aux traités sur les armes chimiques et biologiques), ni réfugiés, ni hôpitaux et Croix-Rouge, sans parler des civils et de leur avenir, de leurs enfants, de l’environnement, tellement empoisonné qu’y vivre sera une condamnation.

Bien que les problèmes pour les peuples palestinien et libanais soient nombreux et immédiats, ces observations ne doivent pas laisser indifférents. Plusieurs appels ont déjà été adressés à et par des experts et chercheurs scientifiques pour faire toute la lumière sur ces événements. Nous avons décidé de répondre à ces appels, en mettant à disposition nos expériences, connaissances et compétences scientifiques.

Nous sommes en train de nous organiser pour apporter un soutien aux institutions sanitaires libanaises et palestiniennes qui demandent une aide et des vérifications. Nous examinons tous les témoignages et les preuves déjà recueillis, avec d’autres experts, pour formuler des hypothèses d’enquête qui puissent être soumises à vérification. Nous demandons une intervention des institutions scientifiques qui nous représentent, et qui ont le devoir d’être vigilants et d’intervenir dans des cas comme celui-ci.

Nous soutenons la requête provenant de plusieurs parties, et en particulier des médecins des zones du conflit, pour que l’ONU constitue une commission internationale et indépendante des gouvernements pour vérifier sur le terrain les accusations d’usage d’armes de nouveau type, et de destruction de masse, par Israël dans le conflit actuel. Nous demandons avec force que soient immédiatement déclenchées des procédures pour garantir que les échantillons biologiques prélevés sur les victimes soient préservés dans les conditions adéquates pour être examinés scientifiquement.

Nous demandons ainsi que cette commission internationale ait accès à toutes les sources disponibles, qu’elle soit opérationelle et respecte les procédures de contrôle croisé par différents laboratoires qui sont la règle dans la « science civile », portant ainsi l’affaire devant les autorités compétentes, y compris le tribunal pour les droits de l’homme, et les cours de justice internationale.

De notre côté, nous nous réunirons le 25 août pour donner une forme opérationnelle permettant l’examen de tous les éléments disponibles jusque là, et élargir le groupe de travail à d’autres experts. En tant que personnes, en tant que chercheuses et chercheurs, nous mettons à disposition tout ce que nous pouvons pour arriver à la connaissance des faits, convaincus que la justice, l’équité et la convivialité pacifique entre les peuples ne peuvent être atteints que dans le respect des règles que la communauté internationale s’est données jusqu’à présent, en ce qui concerne les comportements des parties en conflit. Nous en demandons la vérification.

Nous nous adressons à tous les chercheurs et chercheuses afin qu’ils contribuent à ce travail en apportant leurs compétences scientifiques et leur aide concrète. En particulier, les toxicologues, chimistes, pharmaciens, anatomopathologistes et médecins experts en brûlures et traumas sont invités à envoyer leur email à l’adresse que nous avons créée dans cet objectif : nuovearmi@gmail.com


Angello Baracca, Paola Manduca, Monica Zoppé.


Revenir en haut
Karl
Membre
Membre

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 23 Nov 2009
Messages: 108

MessagePosté le: Sam 26 Déc - 21:16 (2009)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Répondre en citant

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread166081/pg1
http://www.rue89.com/lignes-de-fronts/2009/02/14/la-guerre-au-laser-c-est-p…



Les militaires rêvent de laser depuis son invention, en 1960. Cinquante ans plus tard, ce rêve devient réalité : les armes de guerre au laser arrivent, et à grands pas, au moins chez l'Oncle Sam. Le Pentagone a lancé des dizaines de programmes de recherche et développement d'armes au laser de tous calibres. Certains arrivent à maturité. Suivez le guide !
Commençons par le Laser Avenger de Boeing, monté sur un véhicule léger, qui a démontré récemment (communiqué du 26 janvier), sur le site de White Sands Missile Range, au Nouveau Mexique, qu'il était capable de dézinguer un drone en vol. En 2007, le même engin avait déjà démontré ses talents pour la destruction à distance de mines artisanales et autres explosifs.

Chez Raytheon, on travaille sur le LADS (Laser Area Defence System), un engin installé sur un camion, capable de défendre une zone contre l'artillerie adverse en dégommant les obus à la volée, façon Luky Luke (voir la vidéo). Le laser employé aurait une puissance de 50 kW. Le prototype a déjà démontré sa capacité à détruire des obus de 60 mm statiques, à une distance de 700 mètres. Reste à asservir ce laser avec un dispositif capable de détecter et viser les projectiles à la volée, ce que le constructeur propose déjà dans une version à projectiles classiques (Phalanx) pour la défense des navires.

Plus ambitieux, le HEL TD (High Energy Laser Technology Demonstrator) est un dispositif dit « counter-RAM » (rockets, artillery and mortars), c'est à dire capable de venir à bout tout à la fois des roquettes, de l'artillerie et des mortiers d'en face. Le Pentagone a confié ce projet à Boeing et Northrop Grumman. La puissance considérée pour le laser est cette fois d'au moins 100 kW. Les premiers essais sont prévus pour 2010, les tests sur cibles réelles en 2013, pour un fonctionnement opérationnel en 2015. Plus lourd que le LADS, le HEL TD devrait être installé sur véhicule de type HEMTT (Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck).

La guerre au laser sur terre, c'est pas très glamour

Mais la guerre au laser sur le plancher des vaches, ce n'est pas très glamour. C'est du ciel que viendra le feu d'artifice. Démarré en 2002, le projet ATL (Advanced Tactical Laser) consiste à installer dans un Lockheed C-130 Hercules un laser chimique de 5,5 tonnes, d'une puissance estimée à une centaine de kW. L'avion pourrait ainsi zapper des cibles au sol jusqu'à 20 km de distance. En modulant la puissance du laser, l'ATL pourrait aussi bien crever un pneu d'une Jeep que la détruire. C'est à nouveau Boeing qui est derrière ce projet. Le premier test au sol de l'ATL a eu lieu en août 2008.
Pas sûr que ce projet aboutisse, car on fait actuellement des progrès considérables en matière de rapport puissance sur poids des lasers. Dans ce domaine, le dernier cri, c'est le Hellads (High Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System) de Textron : de la taille d'un gros frigo et pesant 750 kilos, ce laser d'un nouveau type développe 150 kW. Le rapport puissance sur poids serait dix fois supérieur à ce qui se faisait jusqu'à présent. Hellads pourrait du coup être installé sur un avion de chasse. Textron vient d'obtenir en décembre un contrat de 21 M$ de la Darpa (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) pour mettre au point ce laser.

Last but not least, il y a l'ABL (Airborne Laser). Du lourd. Ce projet lancé en 1994 a déjà coûté plus de 4 milliards de dollars. Il consiste à embarquer un laser chimique d'une puissance de l'ordre du mégawatt sur un Boeing 747. C'est une coproduction entre Northrop Grumman (laser), Boeing (porteur, système de commande) et Lockheed Martin pour le système de pointage installé dans le nez de l'avion. Sa mission : tuer des missiles, mais aussi des avions, voire des satellites en orbite basse.
Les tests au sol ont démarré l'année dernière, le premier tir sur cible réelle en vol est prévu pour cet été.

Le laser au lieu des pétoires d'hier, un « progrès » pour qui ? Sans aucun doute pour les actionnaires de Boeing, Northrop Grumman et autres Lockheed Martin… Peut-être même que pour ceux qui seront du côté de la gâchette, le tir au laser sera plus rigolo.

Mais en face, est-ce que l'on saura apprécier à sa juste valeur le progrès accompli par l'humanité en remplaçant le plomb et la poudre par le rayon de la mort qui tue ? Ou pas, d'ailleurs, c'est un argument qui revient souvent dans les prospectus. Et si ça se trouve, la guerre au laser, c'est mieux pour la planète ; -p


Revenir en haut
Mass Trauma
Membre
Membre

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2009
Messages: 96

MessagePosté le: Lun 28 Déc - 05:56 (2009)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Répondre en citant

Armes Electro-magnétique:


Revenir en haut
Fwank
Membre
Membre

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 25 Nov 2009
Messages: 100

MessagePosté le: Mer 30 Déc - 14:39 (2009)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Répondre en citant

http://defense-update.com/directory/THEL.htm

Revenir en haut
Mass Trauma
Membre
Membre

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2009
Messages: 96

MessagePosté le: Dim 3 Jan - 17:35 (2010)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Répondre en citant

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam7.html
http://www.drjudywood.com/media/03_Myers-Rumsfeld_DEW.wmv
http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Microwave_Weapons.htm
http://www.rainews24.it/ran24/inchieste/video/guerre_stellari_english.wmv
http://www.rainews24.it/ran24/inchieste/documenti/guerrestellari_iraq_eng.r…





Sur les armes expérimentales en général:
http://chem11.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=technosphere&action=print&a…


Revenir en haut
4l3x
Administrateur
Administrateur

Hors ligne

Inscrit le: 04 Nov 2009
Messages: 96

MessagePosté le: Mar 5 Jan - 10:06 (2010)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Répondre en citant

Document de la RAI:

-Majid Al Ghezali: They used incredible weapons

-Patrick Dillon: Experimental weapons?

-Majid Al Ghezali: Yes… Yes, I think. They shoot the bus. We saw the bus like a cloth, like a wet cloth. It seemed like a Volkswagen, a big bus like a Volkswagen.

This testimony was reported to American filmmaker Patrick Dillon a few weeks after the battle for the airport. The person interviewed, Majid al Ghezali, is a well-known and respected man in Baghdad, who is the first violinist in the city orchestra.
In addition to describing the battle, Majid al Ghezali wanted to show Patrick Dillon the site near the airport where this mysterious weapon was used, along with the traces of fused metal still visible, and the irregularly sized ditches where the cadavers were buried before they were exhumed.
We sought out Majid al Ghezali to hear more details of his story. We met up with him in Amman and he pointed out some inexplicable peculiarities on the bodies of the victims of the battle for the airport.


-Majid Al Ghezali: Just the head was burnt. In the other parts of the body there wasn’t anything.

Al Ghezali reported that he had seen three passengers in a car, all dead, with their faces and teeth burnt, their clothes intact, and no sign of projectiles.

-Majid Al Ghezali: There wasn’t any bullet. I saw their teeth, just the teeth, and they had no eyes, all of them, there was nothing on their bodies.

There were other inexplicable aspects: the terrain where the battle took place was dug up by the American military and replaced with other fresh earth; the bodies that were not hit by projectiles had shrunk to just slightly more than one meter in height.

-Majid Al Ghezali: Except the ones killed by the bullets, most of them became very small. I mean… like that… Something like that.

When we asked Majid what weapon he imagined had been used, he said that he had reached the conclusion that it must have been a laser weapon.

-Majid Al Ghezali: One year later we heard that they used an update technology, a unique one, like lasers.

We found another disturbing document on the use of mysterious weapons in Iraq, which referred to episodes that took place almost at the same time as those described by Majid al Ghezali.

-Saad al Falluji: They were 26 in the bus. About 20 of them had no head, the head had been cut, some of them had no arms or no legs. The only unwounded was the driver and really I don’t know how he reach our hospital, because one arm was on his side, one head just beside him. It was a very strange and horrible situation.
In the roof of the car there were parts of the body: intestines, brains, all parts of the body. It was a very very very miserable situation.

Geert Van Moorter (medical doctor working in Iraq during and after the war, as a volunteer for the belgiam NGO Medical Aid fot the Third World) Do you have idea with what kind of weapon the attacked the bus?

-Saad al Falluji: We don’t know with what kind of weapon they hit this bus.

-Doctor n°2: It seems to be a new weapon

-Saad al Falluji: Yes, a new weapon

-Doctor n°2: They are trying to do experiments on our civilians. Nobody could identify the type of this weapon.

We went to Belgium to find the filmmaker of this sequence, Geert Van Moorter, a doctor working as a volunteer in Iraq.

-Geert Van Moorter: This footage is taken at the General Teaching Hospital in Hilla, which is about 100 Km from Baghdad, and close to the historical site of Babylon. There I talked with the colleague doctor Saad al Falluji, which is the chief surgeon in that hospital.
Doctor al Falluji said me that the survivors that he operated said him that they did not hear any noise, so there was no explosion to hear, no metal fragments or shrapnels or bullets in their bodies, so they themselves were thinking of some strange kind of weapon which they did not know.

Let’s hear Dr. Saad el Falluji’s story about this in more detail.

-Saad al Falluji: This bus was very crowded, they were going from Hilla to Kifil, to find their families, but before they had arrived at the American checkpoint the villagers said to them “return back, return back”. When the bus tried to return back it was shot by the checkpoint.

-Geert Van Moorter: No gunshot wounds?

-Saad al Falluji: No, no, I don’t know what it was. We are here 10 surgeons and we couldn’t decide which was the weapon that hit this car.

-Geert Van Moorter: But inside the bodies you did not discover ordinary bullets?

-Saad al Falluji: We didn’t find bullets, but most of the passengers were dead, so they took them immediately to the refrigerator and we couldn’t dissect and see, but in those who were alive we didn’t find any kind of bullet. We didn’t find bullets in their bodyes.

-Doctor n°2: Something cutting organs, cutting limbs, attacking the abdomen, attacking the neck and goes out.

Dr. Falluji also ended up speaking about a laser weapon....

-Saad al Falluji: I don’t think that the bombing, or the cluster bombs, or the laser weapons can bring democracy to our country.

As in any war, the war in Iraq, left us a dreadful gallery of horror - images of mutilations that not even doctors can explain. The witnesses referred to laser weapons, arms with mysterious effects. We do not know what kind of weapons could produce such terrible effects. We tried to learn more about it, by asking for interviews to members of companies manufacturing laser and microwave weapons. Yet, the US Defence Department prevented any information from being released to us. They also did not answer - up to the time the film was edited - the questions we had sent them in order to know weather or not experimental weapons had been tested in Iraq and Afghanistan.
We then reviewed the Pentagon’s media conferences released before the II Gulf War. Willingness to test new weapons emerged form the words of both the Defence Secretary and General Meyers. The questions from the media on direct energy and microwave weapons produced a certain amount of embarrassment.


-American journalist: Mr. Secretary, can I ask you a question about some of the technology that you're developing to fight the war on terrorists, specifically directed energy and high-powered microwave technology? Do you -- when do you envision that you can weaponize that type of technology?

-Donald Rumsfeld: Goodness, it is in -- for the most part, the kinds of things you're talking about are in varying early stages. (To the general.) Do you want to -- do you have anything you would add?

-General Myers: I don't think I would add much. It's -- I think they are in early stages and probably not ready for employment at this point.

-Donald Rumsfeld: in the normal order of things, when you invest in research and development and begin a developmental project, you don't have any intention or expectations that one would use it. On the other hand, the real world intervenes from time to time, and you reach in there and take something out that is still in a developmental stage, and you might use it. So the -- your question's not answerable. It is -- depends on what happens in the future and how well things move along the track and whether or not someone feels it's appropriate to reach into a development stage and see if something might be useful, as was the case with the unmanned aerial vehicles.

-American journalist: But you sound like you're willing to experiment with it.

-General Myers: Yeah, I think that's the point. And I think -- and it's -- and we have, I think, from the beginning of this conflict -- I think General Franks has been very open to looking at new things, if there are new things available, and has been willing to put them into the fight, even before they've been fully wrung out. And I think that's -- not referring to these particular cases of directed energy or high-powered microwaves, but sure. And we will continue to do that.

But what is meant by directed-energy and microwave weapons? We went to ask retired colonel John Alexander, former program director in one of the most important military research laboratories in the United States, Los Alamos National Laboratory.

-Retired Colonel John B. Alexander: The research and the concepts for directed energy weapons go back many decades. What is happening is that the technology has now advanced sufficiently that now we are starting to see these weapons becoming real.
There are several types of directed energy weapons and basically what they do is they’re known as “speed of light” because they shoot electrons very fast over very long distances. Lasers of course are in the light range, then there are microwave weapons that are operating at other frequencies, but basically they’re beam weapons, which is nothing physical that goes out, because they move electrons, while the kinetic weapons shoot big bullets to go out and physically hit and destroy something. These work because the energy is deposed on the target and causes some effect.

These images document one of the THEL tests. THEL stands for Tactical High Energy Laser. In the sequence, you can see the laser beam hit and destroy missiles and mortar rounds as they are about to hit the objective.
In this other test we see the laser beam identify and destroy two missiles at the same time.

It doesn’t make any noise and it’s invisible?


-Retired Colonel John B. Alexander: Some are visible, some are just outside… You have, you know, in the infrared range…
What’s emerging now are laser weapons where the effect is that that of the laser. They can be all burners, in what we call High Energy Lasers, because with the concentrated energy you can literally drill holes, you know, in the target.

Former Pentagon analyst William Arkin, who presently works as a journalist for the Washington Post, also confirms this revolutionary change from kinetic weapons to energy weapons.

-William Arkin: For thousands of years, the way in which you have killed someone is you have hit them with a sword, a sphere, an arrow, a bullet, a bomb. It’s kinetic, you’re killing them by hitting them. And now, all of the sudden, out of nowhere, you have a completely new physical principle being applied in killing people, in which they don’t know that they’re being killed because their skin and body is being heated by high power microwaves or they are being hit by a laser that would have an instantaneous effect.

There are other types of weapons made with lasers, such as the device we can see in this sequence. The target is not hit by a projectile, but rather by an impulse of energy that manages to bore through the armor of an armored car.
Excluding acoustic weapons, for the moment, the only sign of the use of energy weapons in a war scenario is a laser device known as Zeus. According to official Pentagon sources, military vehicles equipped with this laser device have been used in Afghanistan to explode mines. According to two reliable military information sites - Defense Tech and Defence Industry Daily - at least three such vehicles are being used in Iraq as well and some people report having seen them.


-Geert Van Moorter: When you showed me the picture of what you described that is a laser weapon, it reminded me that I was talking with some American soldiers, in August 2003, and there was some kind of box on their tank with a blue light like this. I recall it very well not because they said me what it was used for, but because I was teasing a translator, which was an Iraqi female, by telling her “look, with this kind of thing they can look through and see somebody without clothes”. That’s why I remind it, but I have seen for sure this kind of thing on that tank.

William Arkin is one of the American experts who follows the Pentagon activity most closely. So what does Arkin think about the possibility of the use of directed energy weapons in battle in Iraq?

-William Arkin: You know, there’s even some possibility that high power microwaves have been used experimentally. I think that the panic about IEDs, about Improvised Explosives Devices, has been so bad that if these things are sitting in the lab, I’m sure that they want to get them to Iraq to see whether they are effective. So I can imagine that there could be some, what we call, “black” use of these weapons, but not in any significant way, and certainly not in such a way that one would conclude that they’ve had any impact.

But let’s look at the Pentagon budget figures to see how important the outlay is for directed energy weapons.

-William Arkin: Right now you have about $50 million a year being spent for non-lethal weapons, you have about another $200 million or so being spent on High Power Microwaves, Active Denial type Systems, you’ve got probably another $100-200 million being spent on “secret”, “black” laser programs, and then you have the big lasers, the High Energy Lasers of the Air force and the other Tactical Lasers. So probably, when you add all of that up, you know the United States are probably spending $½ billion a year right now on directed energy weapons. This is a significant amount of money; this is the size of the Defence Budget of some countries in Europe.

You might think that energy weapons only pose a danger for the countries involved in a military conflict, but that’s not the case. One particular weapon called the Active Denial System - better known as the pain ray - has been built specifically for use in maintaining public order. Given its claim to be non-lethal and the suffering it produces, this weapon could become a very controversial one.

-Retired Colonel John B. Alexander: The Active Denial System is a Millimetre Wave System, operates at about 93 GHz. It sends out a beam for a very long distance, and what’s important about it is that when it hits the skin it penetrates only a very slight, for a few millimetres under the skin and it it’s the pain receptors and causes, you know, people to be adverse to the pain.
It hurts, it hurts a lot.
The tests that had been run they were to go for 3 seconds, each individual was given a kill switch and nobody made 3 seconds. The answer to the pain is extremely rapid, and you don’t have to do it very long, I mean, it gets your attention instantly.

To understand the consequences this new weapon could have for human rights we went to the Empire State Building in Manhattan, home of the offices of Human Rights Watch, one of the most important human rights organizations.

-Marc Garlasco: We can see the effects of a gun very easily and understand them, but when you cannot see the effect of a weapon because it is not visible and because the science is not very well understood because technology is so new, then it becomes a grieve concern that enrages the states for potential human rights violations and abuses. And that is something that we have to understand about the Active Denial System, that it exists to create pain and is very different in most other non-lethal weapons where the desire is either to immobilize someone or make it so that they cannot walk in the area. With the Active Denial System the main desire is pain, and we have to be very careful because in international law is very clear that devices created solely for the creation of pain can eventually lead to torture and are therefore illegal, and it’s very critical that the United States does a careful legal review of the Active Denial System and is open with their findings. To date they have not been open.

-William Arkin: Some people say “ooh acoustic weapons, or High Power Microwave weapons, the Active Denial System, we can use it for crowd control…”
What crowd control? What does that mean?
It pretends that anyone in the crowd is eighteen years old, and male and in good health, and we’re just going to shoot these microwaves or shoot these acoustic weapons on this crowd, and it’s going to be carefully calibrated at a power level, in the intensity and at a range to affect all these eighteen years old men in the crowd.
Well, what crowd is made up of just eighteen years old men?
Look at the Intifada, look at any riot in Iraq today: children, women, pregnant women, old people, and so the effect… the effect that you would need in order to have an impact on a healthy male, you target, would be too much for a child or a pregnant woman or an old person.

-Marc Garlasco: There’s been a lot of discussion also about the potential for eye damage. They have done some tests on the skin to show that is not harmful, but where is the eye test? And there are concerns raised by scientists about potential harm to the eyes. And we also have concerns about the effects to children, to the infirm, to the elderly… Why are they not producing the data? Why are they not sharing it with us?

As regards the use of the pain ray in the field of war, the military review Defence Industry Daily reports that three Sheriff vehicles were ordered at a price of about 31 million dollars, and that approval has been requested for another 14 vehicles by Brigadier General James Haggin, chief of staff of the multinational forces in Iraq.

-Retired Colonel John B. Alexander: In my view the next global conflict has already began and we don’t have an understanding of what that conflict looks like. Because of the issues of terrorism for instance the adversaries are going to be I think mixed in with civilian populations. We need weapons that allow us to be able to sort, minimize what they call “collateral casualties”. I think the battlefields are going to be in urban areas.

-William Arkin: If you look at the Active Denial System, or the High Power Microwaves, or the LRAD, the acoustic weapon, what you see is enthusiasm for those are being displayed by the Us Northern Command, which is the homeland defence command of the United States, or other counterterrorism organizations, which are looking at them like “oh well, maybe, in some special circumstances we can take these secret weapons, boutique weapons, you know, we have only 10 or 20 of them somewhere in a secret place and if we need them we can pull them out and use them in this kind of specialty warfare”. So ironically, even though the Americans would probably think “oh yeah, special new weapon, it would make sense because Iraq is such a mess and maybe we can do something to turn that corner in some way with the use of this weapon, the truth is that the only real way in which they, the military, sees the prospects for the deployment of these is in their domestic use. And you know quite well… that if the United States adopts these weapons for their domestic defence… Nato in Italy are not far behind…


Revenir en haut
Contenu Sponsorisé






MessagePosté le: Aujourd’hui à 16:59 (2017)    Sujet du message: Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL)

Revenir en haut
Montrer les messages depuis:   
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet    Dark Angel Index du Forum -> X-Files -> Ufos Toutes les heures sont au format GMT + 1 Heure
Page 1 sur 1

 
Sauter vers:  

Portail | Index | Panneau d’administration | créer forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
HalloweenOclock © theme by larme d'ange 2006
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Traduction par : phpBB-fr.com